Posted by Mark on October 10, 2013 at 06:30 | Last modified: January 8, 2014 06:12
Today I will conclude this blog series by talking about making a living through full-time trading.
I cannot accomplish this task by relying solely on trading income to cover monthly expenses. This is too much stress for anyone who is required to think clearly. Any trader will have periods of “feast” and of “famine.” If I require trading profits every month to pay the bills then at some point I am likely to fail. Treat trading as a business. Nobody starts a successful business without having savings to sustain them through the rough times until the business becomes profitable [again].
While I cannot rely on monthly income, I should aim to cover the expenses each and every month. I look to make $X per month. I don’t care what percent return that is or how it fares relative to the broad market. My goal is to avoid having to go back to work for someone else. If I cover my bills on a regular basis then I will be successful.
I would offer two footnotes to the above-stated points. First, while I do not care much about it, if my monthly requirements demand an unrealistic percent return then I need to be cognizant of that to lower risk of going bust. Second, for me a particular type of trading strategy is needed to trade for a living. Because the mortgage is due every month, my personality requires something that will make money most of the time. This means I need to place trades that give me a high probability of making my monthly requirement. More speculative trades tend to have a lower probability of profit, a higher reward-to-risk ratio, and are characteristic of less liquid markets. Speculative trades, as an experienced trader once described, can buy me “dinner and a movie” but are not something to trade with the goal of covering the mortgage. I need to understand the difference.
In summary, I need to implement critical thinking to help determine realistic expectations and then I need to develop a mind-set that keeps me focused on requisite monthly income generation rather than the commonly advertised percent return relative to a benchmark.
Prospective traders: you can do it!
Categories: Option Trading | | Permalink
Posted by Mark on October 7, 2013 at 05:54 | Last modified: January 7, 2014 12:28
As promised in my last post, today I will discuss some trading expectations that I do believe to be realistic.
I believe that profit potential is directly proportional to time frame. A trade that lasts minutes will make less than a trade that lasts days; both market movement and option decay occur in larger magnitude over a longer period of time. I believe position size should be smaller for less consistent trades and for trades with a smaller average-win-to-average-loss ratio. I believe shorter time frames are more inconsistent due to inherent volatility of the markets. Shorter time frames should therefore be traded in smaller size, which is also consistent with limited profit potential.
I believe the discussion of reasonable returns should end around 1% per month of my total net worth. At roughly 12% per year, this would knock the socks off historical stock market returns and make people like Warren Buffett or successful hedge fund managers very proud. I have seen many educational programs and newsletters that tout monthly returns of 5-10%. In my opinion, even claims as low as 2% per month should be closely scrutinized. Are losses taken into account? How long will it take to recover from a loss? If I leverage up with that strategy then will I lose everything after consecutive losses? If I limit position size to 1-2% of my total net worth then will I make enough money to offset the cost of the service?
I am a firm believer that chasing advertised returns can stifle my growth as a trader and/or may completely knock me out of the trading game sooner rather than later. Advertised returns are usually wildly exaggerated. I can use my critical thinking skills to figure out why on a case-by-case basis. The sooner I am able to discern reasonable expectations from misleading marketing, the sooner I will stop wasting time and money likely only to land me in the red.
Finally, I believe I can make a living trading. I’m not convinced that I can make millions of dollars doing this but I can pay the bills. The more money I wish to make as a percentage of my total net worth, the more likely I am to fail and suffer catastrophic loss.
I will conclude this blog series with my next post.
Categories: Option Trading | | Permalink
Posted by Mark on October 4, 2013 at 06:42 | Last modified: January 3, 2014 09:05
In an attempt to formulate a position on what I believe is reasonable to expect as a trader, I have begun by reviewing “trader wisdom” that was the focus of my last blog series.
Continuing on:
> It’s not that you can predict the future with it but you get comfortable with how [the market] reacts.
Yes, I can be comfortable on most days with how the market reacts: until a day rolls around when I am not. At some point the market will make a three, four, or greater standard-deviation move that can potentially knock my socks off. This is what I must prepare for each and every day even though I will only see it on rare occasion.
> I sit here in front of the screens all the time watching the 5-minute bars on all the futures and I’ve
> gotten very comfortable with my trades because I kinda know… I get decent entry points because I
> know how the market is moving around when I’m getting my trades on and I know when to just…
> hold off… doing my adjustment for 5, 10, or 15 minutes to see—you know, typically it’ll reverse here
> so I’ll wait and see and maybe get a better price.
This is too general to be meaningful. To me, the underlying tone suggests this happens regularly, which is not realistic. The subjective terms “comfortable,” “decent,” and “better” are all true if I am on a profitable streak and false if trading has hit the skids for my account.
> On this trade, I think it’s important to really understand how [the market] works so you can see
> the graph and see how these candles affect the trade.
This sounds good and I can see a large audience nodding heads but it becomes meaningless nonsense when I try to analyze it.
> You’ll see patterns among the stocks.”
I find it unrealistic to expect any patterns to be evident in live trading at the hard right edge of a price chart.
I’ll go more into realistic expectations in my next post.
Categories: Option Trading | | Permalink
Posted by Mark on October 1, 2013 at 07:07 | Last modified: January 3, 2014 08:48
What do I know? You must be the judge. I am now in my sixth year of trading for a living. Over that time, I am profitable net living expenses. In recent posts, I have dismissed much as the Holy Grail in sheep’s clothing and because of this, I feel it important to clarify my position on what I do believe is realistically possible to accomplish as a trader.
Let’s begin by reviewing the “trader’s wisdom” that was the subject of my last blog series:
> I think one of the most important things X teaches is trading the same market over and over and over again.
I do believe it is possible to trade one and only one market for a living.
> You get to the point where you don’t need any indicators.
I do believe I can trade for a living without indicators.
> You really understand how the market breathes.
I disagree. The time to be most cautious is when I think I understand how the market works because inevitably it will change direction and catch me with my pants down. If I ever start to believe this then I have become too arrogant.
> You get really comfortable [and really start to think] “okay, I know what I’m doing today.”
Do I know or was I just lucky? I’ll choose the latter and thank goodness each and every day that I’m still in the game.
I will finish the review in my next post.
Categories: Option Trading | | Permalink
Posted by Mark on September 26, 2013 at 06:11 | Last modified: January 24, 2014 08:42
Today I will wrap up my analysis of some apparently sage advice recently offered by an option trader.
Continuing from part 6:
“On this trade, I think it’s important to really understand how [the market] works so you can see the graph and see how these candles affect the trade.”
How the market works? A strong bullish (bearish) candle means positive (negative) PnL for a long (short) trade–is that what he means? This tells me absolutely nothing new. “Master of the obvious” comes to mind.
“You’ll see patterns among the stocks.”
Will those patterns be evident at the hard right edge of the chart where all live trading occurs or only in retrospect? Patterns are always evident in retrospect but not a single person has ever taken a dollar from the markets by trading this way [backtesting]. Making this claim implies the patterns are available at the hard right edge but it would require an extensive research effort to validate that claim. From what I have seen in the markets thus far, I wouldn’t believe it for a second.
In this blog series we studied a clip of stock market wisdom that sounded natural, good, and useful. All it took was some old-fashioned thinking in order to realize what initially seemed bright and shiny was more akin to coal in a holiday stocking.
In the world of trading, there are a lot of teachers and business people willing to tell you how to make consistent profits. Before you pay anything for such “sage advice,” though, I strongly encourage you to get a free sample and subject it to the rigors of critical thinking. This can provide a sneak peek into whether any of it has any merit at all.
Categories: optionScam.com, Wisdom | | Permalink
Posted by Mark on September 23, 2013 at 07:53 | Last modified: January 24, 2014 08:42
In this series, I am challenging some “sage advice” offered by an option trader. I left off with words about a nonexistent Holy Grail.
The trader continued:
“…because I know how the market is moving around when I’m getting my trades on and I know when to just… hold off… doing my adjustment for 5, 10, or 15 minutes to see—you know, typically it’ll reverse here so I’ll wait and see and maybe get a better price.”
This is similar to what he said about “decent entries.” Getting a better price implies saving money on a buy or making more money on a sell. If he can do that on most trades then he can make boatloads of money, which gives this innocent phrase heavy persuasive power.
This quote also implies profitable trading, which once again boosts persuasion in a backward, illogical manner. If his trades fare poorly then he’s probably not going to think anything is a “better” or good price and he’s not going to think any of the entries are “decent.” If his trades fare poorly then he would not encourage trading just one market regularly, either. Yet, none of “getting a better or good price,” “decent entries,” or “trading one market regularly” in and of itself makes for a consistently profitable trading strategy. Why include them as trading advice for those looking to succeed in this endeavor?
Put another way, is this guy trading successfully because of his “sage advice” or is his sage advice relevant only because he’s had a flurry of winning trades? We can’t tell and surely nobody asks because on the surface, his advice sounds solid.
Categories: optionScam.com, Wisdom | | Permalink
Posted by Mark on September 20, 2013 at 09:49 | Last modified: January 24, 2014 08:42
In this series, I am breaking down a snippet of supposed “trader wisdom.”
In picking up where I left off in part 4, the trader continues:
“I sit here in front of the screens all the time watching the 5-minute bars on all the futures…”
He’s got multiple screens going, 5-minute charts, futures… like WOW! He certainly sounds to know what he’s talking about. The newer I am to trading and/or the less experienced I am with taking losses, the more apt I will be to believe him.
Heck, he might even be this trading G-d who I randomly found via Google search:

There are his multiple screens to watch all those intraday futures charts so he must be making millions of dollars.
“…and I’ve gotten very comfortable now with my trades because I kinda know… I get decent entry points…”
The Holy Grail has a very slippery slope and can be described in many ways. One piece of trader wisdom I do believe is that the Holy Grail does not exist. Logic therefore dictates that anything describing the Holy Grail does not exist either. Making millions of dollars easily and quickly through trading: Holy Grail and nonexistent. What about getting “decent entry points?” If the entry point is decent because it is followed by a successful trade then yes, this could be the Holy Grail. By claiming decent entry points the trader implies that on average his trades are profitable. Consistent, positive returns are what any trader seeks in order to be successful, after all.
I will continue to scrutinize said “trader wisdom” in the next post.
Categories: optionScam.com, Wisdom | | Permalink
Posted by Mark on September 17, 2013 at 14:04 | Last modified: January 24, 2014 08:42
Having lain the foundation for critical thinking, I will now begin to analyze the trader “wisdom” as presented in part 1.
The trader begins:
“I think one of the most important things X teaches is trading the same market over and over and over again.”
This suggests I should not trade multiple markets sporadically. I find this interesting because I have often debated whether I should have a watch list approach to trading where I limit myself to a specific group of markets to be analyzed and traded all the time or whether I should use a scanning approach to trade any markets that meet a specified set of criteria. People line both sides of the aisle on this issue. There is no right answer.
“You get to the point where you don’t need any indicators. You really understand how the market breathes.”
That sounds encouraging! This also sounds very meaningful and even, dare I say, intimate. Good persuasive technique.
“You get really comfortable [and really start to think] ‘okay, I know what I’m doing today.’ It’s not that you can predict the future with it but you get comfortable with how [the market] reacts.”
The unspoken premise here is if I consistently make money trading it. Surely if I am losing then I will not feel comfortable or very knowledgeable. If my losses are great enough then I won’t think I know a damn thing and I might even decide to throw in the towel altogether! In other words, by phrasing the advice in this way, he suggests you will make money consistently because that is the only way his statement will be true. This is good persuasive technique as well.
Are you getting the gist of where I’m going with all this? I will continue with my next post.
Categories: optionScam.com, Wisdom | | Permalink
Posted by Mark on September 12, 2013 at 07:22 | Last modified: January 24, 2014 08:41
In my last post I began to lay some foundation for critical thinking. This is useful to evaluate others’ claims in the financial industry or otherwise.
Television has dramatized countless times over the decades how you often cannot believe what people say. Summed together, CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, CSI: Miami, and CSI: New York have entertained audiences to over 740 television episodes and not a single episode has failed to feature a suspect who did not lie. The same may be said for patients of Gregory House in 177 episodes of House, M.D. Pretty Little Liars features continuous deceit as does [probably] any and every soap opera ever to appear on TV. If people in general can’t be trusted then claims about success (read: marketing) certainly cannot be accepted without intense scrutiny.
This is valid reason why you probably should not heed others’ advice in financial matters. “Others’ advice” may include premium investment advisories, investment/trading education packages or “mentorships,” and for-profit trading rooms (if you are paying then they are profiting). The ultimate arbiter is the PnL and regardless of how well they organize a presentation, you can never verify its true authenticity. Visiting face-to-face with the person and holding in your hand monthly brokerage statements with account numbers displayed tempts true belief but in the financial industry this never, ever happens. More often, you talk to people over the phone, e-mail via the Internet, and see or hear alleged performance numbers. Never do you personally witness a signed tax return complete with SSN.
This simple observation about human nature gives me tremendous latitude to say things that sound very logical on the surface. If I present these words with confidence and appear to have a following of others then I may even have great persuasive power. An apparent following may include positive reviews on Amazon.com, virtual participants appearing to be attending my webinars, students I claim to be enrolled in my education program, or my face frequenting financial media such as theStreet.com articles or CNBC segments. When you believe me then you will pay me because you hope I can make you rich.
In too many cases, all you will end up doing is allowing me to live criminally.
Categories: optionScam.com, Wisdom | | Permalink
Posted by Mark on September 9, 2013 at 07:40 | Last modified: January 24, 2014 08:41
A few days ago, I heard a trader addressing a group. By the tone of his voice and the superficial meaning of his words, this was certainly sage advice. Today I will begin to lay the framework of critical thinking that should always be employed to evaluate what people say in financial circles [or anywhere else, perhaps].
The ultimate arbiter on all things right or wrong about financial markets is the profit/loss (PnL). I can say whatever I want about this stock or that market, this pattern or that valuation, this metric or that performance statistic. If I make money for myself or for others then I will stay in the game. If I lose money then I will eventually go bust and you will hear me no more.
Unfortunately for those listening, you can never know what my true PnL is. I can tell you that I’ve made hundreds of millions of dollars in stocks. Will you believe me? In an industry sometimes suspected of snake oil, chicanery, and egregious fraud driven by human greed, should you believe me?
If there’s any possible way that I might profit now or later from your belief then you probably should not believe me.
Mull that over for a couple days and I will continue to develop this thesis in my next post.
Categories: optionScam.com, Wisdom | | Permalink