Option FanaticOptions, stock, futures, and system trading, backtesting, money management, and much more!

The Stealthy Sisters of Spin and Speculation (Part 5)

I highly recommend the book Practical Speculation by Laurel Kenner and Victor Niederhoffer (2003).

Part 1 [no need to waste your time reading Part 2] talks about a variety of ways people in trading/investing circles spin things. Kenner and Niederhoffer discuss unfounded claims, bogus statistics, and an overall lack of science that exists in the financial industry. I believe this is mandatory information for anybody aiming to make a serious go at trading/investing. Understanding the dangers/limits of speculation can help keep traders safe.

Speaking of making a “serious go,” remember my “forest for the trees” analogy that suggests many people think they are doing the right thing when in fact they are merely speculating. I regard speculation as gambling and one reason so many traders [allegedly] fail. To satisfy the ego, people may wager on things and boast loudly when they win. Like the slot machines at a casino, the loud boasting is an advertisement to others that they, too, can be right at sometime in the future and win big. The boasting therefore serves to sustain the speculative enterprise.

The losers will probably exit the spotlight quietly with tail between their legs. All the better if nobody notices them slinking out the side door to save embarrassment and ego insult.

Speculation is not the way to make consistent income in the markets. Speculation is the only thing many people know, however. These folks have not learned any “responsible trading/investing” strategies. They haven’t studied the markets enough to understand what risk is really about. Some think they know to varying degrees but they land far short. For them, the intermittent trade or investment and the occasional winner produce a feeling of mastery. That will likely come tumbling down with tragic consequences later if they have been “fooled by randomness” for far too long.

The Stealthy Sisters of Spin and Speculation (Part 4)

I left off with a mess, basically. If necessary, please go back and read the previous installments to refresh your memory.

With regard to group discussion about trading/investing, it might be beneficial to identify everyone’s background in advance. It’s easy for anybody to say things that sound good whether they be full-time traders or part-time speculators. What might be said by the latter can be toxic to the former, though. Speculative content is also not generally actionable for people looking to get involved with responsible trading/investing. Laypeople should have the opportunity to align themselves with where they want to be.

The challenge then becomes educating people on what makes for speculative vs. responsible trading/investing content.

I trade full-time for a living and I lean strongly to the “responsible trading/investing” side. If I screw up then I’m out of business and I go back to a conventional, corporate job. While I did say speculation may be okay in small doses, my personal bias is to do it outside the markets altogether [as an aside, because many laypeople think all trading/investing is gambling I often get a laugh when asked if I ever play casino games because I respond “I don’t gamble”].

Besides myself, financial advisers and wealth management professionals also shy away from speculation. Many of their clients are closer to retirement and speculation flies in the face of capital preservation.

Financial advisers avoid speculation but make constant use of spin. This has been addressed in previous blog posts.

The end result of spin and speculation can be similar and that’s my reason for describing them as sisters. They are stealthy because people don’t recognize them and see the complete landscape (i.e. the “forest for the trees” analogy). Laypeople think the spin and speculation are responsible trading/investing, which they are not. Both spin and speculation lead people to trade/invest in managers/strategies they believe will generate profits. More often than not, though, I believe this works out to their detriment.

An insightful book has been written on speculation. I will discuss that in the next post.

The Stealthy Sisters of Spin and Speculation (Part 3)

Something feels wrong to me about the part-time futures day trader Mr. Know It All. Hobbies are part-time activities and I believe this level of commitment usually fares poorly in the markets. Why bother, then? I suspect many people who dabble in trading do not realize this is what they are actually doing.

Consistent losses belong in the gambling/speculation category. Whether it be the lottery, slot machines, Blackjack, etc., repeated small losses are the norm rather than the exception. Sure I have the chance of winning huge but the odds are against me and the law of large numbers says if I play enough then I will go to zero.

I feel my last blog post went off on a tangent and completely rehashed an earlier one. Perhaps there is something slightly new here in terms of flushing out speculation, though.

I think the problem with general discussion/debate about the markets is a failure to understand where participants are coming from. A speculator has completely different motives than someone looking to make consistent money. Speculation cannot be used to make consistent money in the markets. I think everyone would consider that idea to be foolhardy: it’s nothing more than gambling. We therefore have to pay close attention to what is actionable (responsible trading/investing) vs. what is spin (speculation) and that is where critical thinking can truly be useful.

This is a huge thesis for me and one I should probably develop further.

One complicating factor is that speculation can arguably be okay in small doses. Perhaps Mr. Know It All has 70% of his total net worth with an investment adviser and a couple checking accounts for daily expenses. He may then have some money leftover that he can use for speculative purposes (e.g. day trading futures, a lottery ticket every now and then, the occasional visit to MGM Grand, etc.). Many people still believe the ancient Greek ideal “everything in moderation.” Similar to rewarding a healthy, disciplined diet with a small serving of junk food, a small amount of speculation is probably okay if the overall portfolio is healthy.

The Stealthy Sisters of Spin and Speculation (Part 2)

I believe people often mistake Spin for responsible investing/trading. I suspect the same may be said about Speculation.

Mr. Know It All has admitted to consistent losses from day trading futures. I believe he does this to pass the time. He is retired and where other people pay for golf memberships or for tennis lessons, he pays to day trade.

A part of me does not believe trading/investing should ever be something done just to pass the time. If asked point blank, I don’t think Mr. Know It All would admit this either. [I hope] He would say he enjoys day trading and if he loses a little money on a consistent basis then he can afford it. I noticed early on that when people asked questions about trading/investing, Mr. Know It All was quick to stick his nose in [to an amusing extent] and give answers. Perhaps his day trading makes him feel qualified to seek this ego boost coming in the form of appreciation for his “knowledge.”

Yet, because he’s a consistent loser I regard Mr. Know It All as the last person who should ever be answering questions. What he does is clearly not trading as a business: consistent losses would make for a horrible business model! What he does is clearly not responsible trading/investing, either: consistent losses could land someone in the poorhouse!

I think most people interested to incorporate trading/investing into their lives are at least looking for supplemental income and at most seeking permanent long-term income replacement. I doubt any newbie is looking “just to pass the time” if the very activity done for the purpose of making money would do nothing more than generate small losses on a regular basis. Why listen to anyone who is doing just that, then?

The Stealthy Sisters of Spin and Speculation (Part 1)

I believe in large part, people mistake the forest for the trees when it comes to trading and investing. To explain this, I will step back and review some of the things I have seen over these last couple weeks.

I saw a lot of spin on August 11 with Mr. Black Box: the guy selling an algorithmic trading system. Spin is advertising or marketing. In my view, spin dominates the financial industry. Spin is misdirection, illusion, and non-information. Spin is everything that sounds good but doesn’t actually work.

Spin is not what trading/investing is about and I think many people fail to realize this. Spin often wins when a financial adviser gains a new customer. Spin wins when an investing newsletter [service] gets a new subscriber. Spin wins when someone decides to pay money for a trading system. Most of this is [inadequately] tested and/or does not have a high probability of working in the future. What jumps to mind is optionScam.com.

With regard to the cliché, I believe people look at “spin trees” and think they are seeing the whole forest. Unfortunately, many people get taken in by this, suffer catastrophic losses, and swear off investing altogether as a risky pursuit. They never realize that besides the spin, many other trees representing responsible trading/investing also live in the forest.

What’s worse is they feel so violated, embarrassed, and ashamed that they never want to tell anybody about their negative experience. Just like [physical, emotional, sexual, etc.] abuse, con-artistry perpetuates because it lives in the dark corners of the room. It’s like a vampire that would burn were sunlight ever shined upon it. In classic literature, light often represents “the good” and “knowledge.” People get taken advantage of because they lack knowledge.

Is Speculation one of Spin’s sinister sisters? I will address that in the next post.

A Losing Thesis (Part 2)

I realized this week how little discussion I have seen lately about trading losses.

Because I believe one of the best ways to improve as a trader is to discuss and study losses, I am a bit surprised more people aren’t doing this. I’m quite sure not everyone around me is realizing windfall trading profits. Is it a matter of ego where people feel ashamed/embarrassed to talk about losses since many regard losing as failure? Maybe people feel angry or depressed and don’t want to rub the sore spot? I talk freely about my losses and you will rarely hear me expressing heroic victory over a win unless I am being sarcastic.

Perhaps people aren’t talking about losses because they aren’t doing any significant trading. I mentioned the woman from August 11 who is currently out of the market. Everyone from that Tuesday Meetup mentioned a full-time job. Mr. Know It All, the day trader from the Wednesday Meetup, is retired so he probably isn’t devoting 40+ hours/week. I know a few others from that Meetup work full-time and hope to learn enough about investing to supplement income. Everyone in my option trading group has a separate full-time job.

It’s quite clear from my experience that the vast majority of traders do so part-time. The level of commitment among part-timers ranges from serious/intense to intermittent/zero. When trading part-time, it’s easy to close a position or two and not be trading at all.

One other thing is quite clear to me as well: people doing no trading are not developing as traders. Luck aside, if they want to make consistent money in the markets then they need to consistently work and develop the craft. I believe only the serious part-timers have a good chance to fare well so the rest might as well disappear when the going gets rough to live more comfortably, right?

A Losing Thesis (Part 1)

At the end of last week, someone posted the following in a trading forum I follow:

> Where r all the SMART traders when the market is going down ???

I have also realized this on multiple occasions: on-line forums tend to get very quiet when the market moves lower.

I believe the participants are either in pain from losing money or not trading and therefore have nothing to contribute.

If they are not trading then I would guess they are not making consistent money overall. The market goes up and down and I have to trade in both environments. Only in Fantasyland would I ever be able to choose just one because I would always make money. My guess is traders like this are losing money overall because finding the perfect trading system is very, very difficult. If these traders are net positive then they are probably not making a whole lot.

If these traders are losing money then hopefully they haven’t been trading too large and are soon (or already have) to be knocked out of the game altogether.

I think part of the market cycle is that people win for extended periods and get “fooled by randomness:” we think we have great skill, we become overconfident, and we ratchet up our position size. When the market eventually acts nasty as it periodically does, we get beaten down hard. The losses are such a blow to our egos that we walk quietly into the night never to speak of it again.

This is my explanation for why I hear so many people talking about winning trades but very few talking about losing ones.

I’m categorizing this under Wisdom but please take it with a grain of salt. I don’t think any definitive answers are knowable here. This is my thesis based on psychology teachings and my subjective history of observations over the years.

Meetup Update (Part 3)

As previously discussed, the Tuesday Meetup included some boisterous, opinionated discussion along with a “professional quant” in attendance. Nothing there was actionable.

While I enjoy and recommend the Wednesday Meetup, I did not find that content actionable, either. While the title includes the words “investment academy,” this Meetup is an order of magnitude less specific than helping people to trade profitably. I do not fault the organizers since they cater to beginners. They did say on Wednesday one directive is to foster collaboration among the group, however. I will keep my eyes open over the next few events to see if we move any closer to fulfilling this actionable promise.

I have organized a small option trading group that meets every week. We have roughly six regular participants and a Yahoo! Group. I posted extensively about my losing weekly calendar and one other member posted about a losing monthly trade. Nobody else mentioned any losing trades. I thought back over the last few weeks and realized that while I post about my losing trades often, rarely does anybody else.

At the Wednesday Meetup, Mr. Know It All said he lost money that day in response to my direct questioning. Thinking such a wide-ranging market day would be good for day trading, I asked for details. He spoke for a couple minutes and then quickly changed the subject. Why he lost could have been precisely the kind of actionable information I seek but alas, that was not to be forthcoming.

On Tuesday night, I didn’t hear any meaningful discussion about losses aside from the Forex guy who is on a crusade. Contrary to my thesis, this might not be a reflection of inflated egos but it does make me wonder whether anybody is actually trading. The woman in attendance who I found to be extremely amusing said she was flat right now awaiting further direction by the market.

I will continue with my thesis on losses in the next post.

Meetup Update (Part 2)

In the last post I mentioned that neither Meetup I attended this week provided any actionable ideas.

A discussion awaits about what “actionable” really means. For now, consider it “capable of generating trading profits.”

Tuesday evening involved a number of attendees sitting around at a bar eating and drinking. My beer was outstanding but neither that nor the buzz that followed were actionable.

Perhaps the closest thing to actionable was one guy’s experience about losing money trading Forex. He is now on a crusade to make sure everyone knows what a scam Forex is for the retail trader. His experience mirrored what I have studied about Forex so I think his advice to avoid Forex is indirectly actionable. By avoiding Forex we may avoid losses, which is akin to making money.

Much unactionable debate was had about the state of the economy, future direction of markets, and other fundamental information. I would argue that none of this provides market edge. Predictions are uncertain bets or wagers that belong in the gambling domain. People can be right if lady luck chooses to shine on them. If you believe otherwise then I would refer you to any number of intelligent minds who make incorrect predictions daily on CNBC.

Like fundamental analysis, most black box trading systems are not actionable. One attendee on Tuesday talked about a trading model he develops and sells. Since I have yet to write on this topic, I’ll reference this article as a reason to steer clear. On Tuesday I asked my new friend how his model has been validated (that’s a financial engineering term).

“By the testimonials of our customers,” he said.

Ha!

In the con-artistry game, most testimonials are confederates of the bad guy. Welcome to the world of finance. Personally, I would not consider his product actionable unless I tested it myself. That would require more resources than I have available at this time.

I will continue in the next post.

Meetup Update (Part 1)

I attended two trader Meetups this week. Combined with a wacky market over the first three days, I walked away with some interesting impressions.

For the fourth time out of five weeks, I realized a loss Wednesday on my weekly calendar trade. The market was way down in the morning but rebounded to close almost flat. Had I simply checked in at EOD, I would have been fine! Unfortunately, on a weekly trade I can’t do that. The weekly trades force me to pay close attention to the market intraday and I expect to have days like Wednesday where the ride will feel like a Cedar Point roller coaster. I had one beer at the Meetup on Tuesday evening.  By the close on Wednesday, I felt like I needed two more.

I actually recommend one of the two Meetups I attended this week. This was the third event and I wrote about it a couple months ago. If only to give them props, here is the comment I posted on their site yesterday:

> The organizers provide free refreshments and a free raffle,
> they are polished presenters, they field difficult audience
> members/questions… they’re not annoying with any sort of
> hard sell… after three Meetups so far, I’m flat-out
> impressed. Keep up the good work, guys! I’ll continue to
> make the 50-minute drive.

Having said all that, the Meetup does share something in common with the one I attended on Tuesday: I found nothing actionable at either one.

This is very unfortunate. Common sense may be to say if I am attending a trading Meetup then I hope to take away some trading ideas. Because I go for other reasons (e.g. social, networking), I’m really okay either way. I’m quite sure the Meetup organizers would consider the inclusion of actionable information an improvement to their programs, though, and for that reason I believe this is something worth further discussion.